Mother Kills Son - Still Gets Alimony
.
Mother Kills Son - Still Gets Alimony A man must pay alimony to his ex-wife--who killed their son. Glenn Sacks
.
posted by angryharry @ 22:36
2 comments
Women. Women. Women.
Can't live without them. Can't shoot them. What to do, eh?
Mother Kills Son - Still Gets Alimony A man must pay alimony to his ex-wife--who killed their son. Glenn Sacks
.
Previous Posts
- Driven To Suicide By Mother Of Friend
- Caring Nurses
- Shameful Secrets of the Big Brother Women
- Pregnant Victim 'Was Still Alive'
- On Single Women Preying On Husbands
- Top Woman Tennis Coach Beds 13 Year Old
- Women Prefer Men With Deep Voices
- Offensive Breasts Banned In Casino
- Lesbian Parents Upset Over Getting Twins
- Beaten Up By 'Wild Animals'
2 Comments:
This type of alimoney outrage is possible in america and elsewhere, because american males themeselves, like other western males, have foresaken their own gender for profit.
In return for a wealthier society, american males have agreed to live and die, as lowly as slave dogs and in extreme personal dishonour.
The question recently came up as to why western males are divided and increasingly friendless. And the resounding answer was that you cannot make friends of men that voluntarily live without mutual self respect. You cannot respect them as decent people if they dont respect themselves !
In an honest society, a mother whose violent beating brings about the death of a child commits an abomination, the punishment of which is capital and absolute. She cannot expect reward or profit out of the bereaved fathers pocket for her vile deed, let alone another day in court on which to claim it. Otherwise you inflict a double insult to the father and the universe, whose reactions may bring about graver consequences to the society that condoned such outrage.
Almost every day, and not just in america alone, you see prospective male leaders and incumbents compete with themeselves to see who can further reduce their fellow man into mere economic objects off which society at large can profit however imoraly.
No regard is had to the ethics or justice of these measures espoused against males or the ultimate consequences of the same. Listen to the feckless boasting of craven senator Bidden for example.
Ultimately the mens movement must realise that their fight is not with women or feminists, whom only ever accepted what was offered by men or made politically availiable.
No. The fight is against males of our own gender whose chauvenism and bigottry has brought about a society where men are expected to further pay for the privilege of having their first born sons murdered by their mothers.
I mean can you imagine a more lowly and disgraceful way of living. A big shame on all of us. We really sold out on ourselves didnt we ?
POIUYT
"In return for a wealthier society, american males have agreed to live and die, as lowly as slave dogs and in extreme personal dishonour..."
Errr... It was financed through over burdensome taxation and slight of hand, under the guise of socialist policy.
No genuine gains other then a few extra deaths and genuine dependency. Lot's of bad blood and more then a few unrecoverable errors.
Post a Comment
<< Home